- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-159/16: Action brought on 15 April 2016 — Metronia v EUIPO — Zitro IP (TRIPLE O NADA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0159
62016TN0159
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.6.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 211/61
(Case T-159/16)
(2016/C 211/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Metronia, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘TRIPLE O NADA’ — Application for registration No 11 603 529
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2016 in Case R 2605/2014-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—uphold the action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of 15 February 2016 and allow the EU trade mark applied for;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.