- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-35/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION — Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0035
62021TA0035
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.5.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 207/38
(Case T-35/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION - Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 207/49)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: SFD S.A. (Opole, Poland) (represented by: T. Grucelski, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Allmax Nutrition Inc. (North York, Ontario, Canada)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 October 2020 (Case R 511/2020-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Allmax Nutrition and SFD.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders SFD S.A. to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.