- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-282/17: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — UI v Council (Civil service — Official — Action for failure to act — No decision following the report on the probationary period — Article 34 of the Staff Regulations — Decision to dismiss — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TB0282
62017TB0282
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/59
(Case T-282/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Civil service - Official - Action for failure to act - No decision following the report on the probationary period - Article 34 of the Staff Regulations - Decision to dismiss - No need to adjudicate))
(2019/C 44/76)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: UI (represented by: J. Diaz Cordova, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Meyer and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU and seeking a declaration that the Council unlawfully failed to adopt, within the period prescribed under the Staff Regulations, a decision regarding the establishment of the applicant as an official.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The parties shall bear their own costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.