I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Action for annulment and for damages - Economic and monetary policy - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms - Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Act not open to challenge - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/2078)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicants: Mario López Campo (Pontevedra, Spain) and the eight other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: F. Cabadas García, lawyer)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, A. Lapresta Bienz and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)
By their action, the applicants seek, first, under Article 263 TFEU, the annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Executive Session of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA, and, secondly, compensation for the loss in value of their shares arising from the adoption of that decision.
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by the Kingdom of Spain, the European Commission, Banco Santander, SA and Banco Popular Español, SA.
3.Mr Mario López Campo and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).
4.The Kingdom of Spain and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.
5.Banco Santander shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Banco Popular Español relating to the applications for leave to intervene.
—
(1) OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2078/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—