- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-94/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2009 — Rebizant, Vlandas and Vocino v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2006 procedure — Multiplier rate — Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations — Article 9 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Promotion threshold)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007FA0094
62007FA0094
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/71
(Case F-94/07)
(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2006 procedure - Multiplier rate - Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations - Article 9 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Promotion threshold)
2010/C 24/129
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Jean Rebizant (Karlsruhe, Germany), Georges Vlandas (Brussels, Belgium) and Vinceno Vocino (Varese, Italy) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)
Re:
First, annulment of the decision not to promote the applicants to grade AD13 under the 2006 promotion procedure and, second, declaration that the decision setting the promotion thresholds applicable to officials under the “Research” and “Joint Research Centre” budgets is illegal.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 283, 24.11.2007, p. 45.