EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-837/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2019 — Sweden v Commission (REACH — Commission decision authorising the use of lead sulfochromate yellow and of lead chromate molybdate sulfate red — Article 60(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Consideration of the unavailability of alternatives — Error in law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0837

62016TA0837

March 7, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.4.2019

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/46

(Case T-837/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)

(REACH - Commission decision authorising the use of lead sulfochromate yellow and of lead chromate molybdate sulfate red - Article 60(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Consideration of the unavailability of alternatives - Error in law)

(2019/C 148/42)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: initially, A. Falk and F. Bergius, and subsequently, A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Shev and J. Lundberg, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lindenthal, K. Mifsud-Bonnici, K. Simonsson and G. Tolstoy, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: initially, C. Thorning and M. Wolff, and subsequently, M. Wolff and J. Nymann-Lindegren, acting as Agents); Republic of Finland (represented by: S. Hartikainen, acting as Agent); and the European Parliament (represented by: A. Neergaard and A. Tamás, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, W. Broere and C. Schultheiss, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 5644 final of 7 September 2016 granting an authorisation for some uses of lead sulfochromate yellow and of lead chromate molybdate sulfate red under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 5644 final of 7 September 2016 granting an authorisation for some uses of lead sulfochromate yellow and of lead chromate molybdate sulfate red under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006;

2.Dismisses the Commission’s application seeking, in the event of the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 5644 final of 7 September 2016, that the effects of that decision be maintained until the Commission is able to review the application for authorisation;

3.Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Kingdom of Sweden;

4.Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the European Parliament to bear their own costs.

(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia