EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-227/25 P: Appeal brought on 24 March 2025 by DR and DS against the order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 17 January 2025 in Case T-182/24, DR and DS v EIOPA

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0227

62025CN0227

March 24, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3267

(Case C-227/25 P)

(C/2025/3267)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: DR, DS (represented by: N. Flandin, avocate)

Other party to the proceedings: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA)

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:

annul the order under appeal;

grant the appellants the benefit of their submissions at first instance, and consequently:

declare the appellants’ action admissible;

declare the appellants’ action well founded in so far as:

the EIOPA has committed sufficiently serious breach of rules of law conferring rights on individuals, and in particular of Articles 8 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons regarding the processing of personal data;

the appellants have suffered a nonmaterial damage;

the non-material damage suffered by the appellants result directly from the above-mentioned illegalities;

consequently:

order the compensation of the non-material damage suffered by the appellants;

order the EIOPA to pay all the costs in first instance and on appeal:

or, if that is not possible:

refer the case back to the General Court for judgment, the costs of the appeal being paid in accordance with the rules laid down in Article 184 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the appellants rely on two pleas in law:

First plea: Violation by the General Court of an essential procedural requirement – Insufficient motivation

Second plea: Violation by the General Court of the Union law – Error in law in the interpretation of the concept of ‘any person to whom these Staff Regulations apply’ as laid down by Article 91(1) of the Staff Regulation

(1)

OJ 2018, L 295, p. 39.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3267/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia