- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-298/25, Ofsets: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 22 April 2025 – Ofsets Limited v Sabena Technics Helicopters, Stoltd Partner Limited
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0298
62025CN0298
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4035
28.7.2025
(Case C-298/25, Ofsets)
(C/2025/4035)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Ofsets Limited
Respondents: Sabena Technics Helicopters, Stoltd Partner Limited
Question referred
Must Article 1(1) of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations and Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) be interpreted as meaning that an action for damages for the abrupt termination of an established business relationship, assessed on the basis of legislative provisions governing practices regarded as restrictive of competition, and thus of a legal obligation to refrain from a certain type of conduct, falls within the ambit of matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, irrespective of any contractual relationship that may have been established between the parties?
—
(1)
OJ 2007 L 199, p. 40.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4035/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—