- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases T-253/09 and T-254/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2010 — Wilo v OHIM (Faceted casing of an electric motor and representation of green facets) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Faceted casing of an electric motor — Application for a Community trade mark representing green facets — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0253
62009TA0253
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.1.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 30/37
(Joined Cases T-253/09 and T-254/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Faceted casing of an electric motor - Application for a Community trade mark representing green facets - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 30/66
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Wilo SE (Dortmund, Germany) (represented by: G. Braun, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt and P. Quay, agents)
Re:
Two actions brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 March 2009 (Cases R 1184/2008-1 and R 1196/2008-1) concerning applications for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of faceted casing of an electric motor and a figurative sign representing green facets.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action.
2.Orders Wilo SE to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 205, 29.8.2009.