I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Community word mark NIMEI LA PERLA MODERN CLASSIC – Earlier national figurative and word marks la PERLA and LA PERLA PARFUMS – Relative ground for refusal – Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark enjoying a reputation (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(5)) (see para. 51)
Re:
APPEAL lodged against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2005 (Case R 537/2004-1) relating to cancellation proceedings between Gruppo La Perla SpA and Worldgem Brands – Gestão e Investimentos L
Registered Community trade mark of which cancellation sought:
Word mark NIMEI LA PERLA MODERN CLASSIC for goods in Class 14 – Application No 713446
Proprietor of the contested Community trade mark:
Worldgem Brands – Gestão e Investimentos Lda, formerly Cielo Brands – Gestão e Investimentos Lda
Party applying for cancellation:
Trade marks of the applicant for cancellation:
Italian marks:
la PERLA, for goods in Class 25 – Figurative mark No 769526;
LA PERLA PARFUMS, for goods in Class 3 – Word mark No 776082;
la PERLA, for goods in Classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 24, 25 and 35 – Figurative mark No 804992;
la PERLA for goods in Class 3 – Figurative mark No GE 2002 C 000181
Decision of the Cancellation Division:
Application upheld; Community trade mark cancelled
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal allowed: decision of the Cancellation Division set aside
The Court:
Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 January 2005 (Case R537/2004-1);
Orders the intervener to bear its own costs and to bear one third of the applicant’s costs;
Orders the applicant to bear two thirds of its own costs;
Orders OHIM to bear its own costs.