EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-410/23, Pielatak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 – I. SA v S.J.

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0410

62023CN0410

July 3, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2911

6.5.2024

(Case C-410/23, Pielatak)

(C/2024/2911)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: I. SA

Defendant: S.J.

Questions referred

1.Do Article 2(b) and (c) of Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the definition of consumer contained therein, and recital 17 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, also cover a farmer who concludes a contract for the purchase of electricity both for an agricultural holding and for private purposes for a household?

2.Must Article 3(5) and (7) of and recital 51 and Annex I(1)(a) and (e) to Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC, which requires that no charge be levied on consumers in the event of withdrawal from a contract for the provision of electricity services, be interpreted as precluding the possibility of imposing a contractual penalty on an energy consumer customer for the termination of a fixed-term contract for the provision of electricity (Article 4j(3a) of the Polish Law on energy of 10 April 1997)?

This case has been given a fictitious name which does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.

OJ. 1993 L 95, p. 29; Polish Special Edition: Chapter 15 Volume 002 P. 288 – 293.

OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64.

OJ 2009 L 211, p. 55.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2911/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia