I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
6.5.2024
(C/2024/2911)
Language of the case: Polish
Applicant: I. SA
Defendant: S.J.
1.Do Article 2(b) and (c) of Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the definition of consumer contained therein, and recital 17 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, also cover a farmer who concludes a contract for the purchase of electricity both for an agricultural holding and for private purposes for a household?
2.Must Article 3(5) and (7) of and recital 51 and Annex I(1)(a) and (e) to Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC, which requires that no charge be levied on consumers in the event of withdrawal from a contract for the provision of electricity services, be interpreted as precluding the possibility of imposing a contractual penalty on an energy consumer customer for the termination of a fixed-term contract for the provision of electricity (Article 4j(3a) of the Polish Law on energy of 10 April 1997)?
This case has been given a fictitious name which does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.
OJ. 1993 L 95, p. 29; Polish Special Edition: Chapter 15 Volume 002 P. 288 – 293.
OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64.
OJ 2009 L 211, p. 55.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2911/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—