- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-97/25: Action brought on 11 February 2025 – HS v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0097
62025TN0097
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/1894
(Case T-97/25)
(C/2025/1894)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: HS (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Selection Board of 25 July 2024 excluding the applicant from the COM/AST3/2024 internal competition;
—Order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 5 000 by way of compensation for damage caused by the defendant’s error;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on one single plea in law alleging the arbitrary nature of the decision to exclude her from the competition, based on the unsubstantiated claim according to which she had breached the competition rules. The applicant considers that the decision is neither explained nor reasoned and does not allow her to understand the origin of that serious accusation which was the reason for her exclusion from the competition and regarding which she could not defend herself other than by confirming that she did not use a second screen during the tests.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1894/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—