- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-474/17: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2019 — Portugal v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Portugal — Late payments — Overshooting of ceilings — Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 — Double financial correction — Proportionality — Payment deadlines)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0474
62017TA0474
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 295/21
(Case T-474/17) (*)
(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Portugal - Late payments - Overshooting of ceilings - Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 - Double financial correction - Proportionality - Payment deadlines)
(2019/C 295/26)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by L. Inez Fernandes, M, Figueiredo, J. Saraiva de Almeida and P. Estêvão, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by B. Rechena and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1144 of 26 June 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2017 L 165, p. 37), in so far as it excludes from European Union financing, for the 2011 financial year, expenditure declared by the Portuguese Republic for late payments and the overshooting of ceilings.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Portuguese
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140