- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-460/18 P: Appeal brought on 12 July 2018 by HK against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Eighth Chamber) on 3 May 2018 in Case T-574/16 HK v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0460
62018CN0460
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.10.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 381/4
—
(Case C-460/18 P)
(2018/C 381/05)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: HK (represented by: A. Champetier, S. Rodrigues, lawyers)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
—Declare that the appeal is admissible and well founded;
—Annul the judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2018 (Case T-574/16);
—Dispose of the case itself by upholding the claims made at first instance by the appellant, including the claim that the defendant be ordered to pay the costs; or in the alternative
—Refer the case back to the General Court for a ruling and, in those circumstances, make an order as to the costs of the appeal in accordance with Article 184 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of its appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds. The first ground is based on infringement of the first paragraph of Article 17 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, and the ambiguous, incoherent and contradictory nature of the statement of reasons. The second ground is based on infringement of the principle of non-discrimination and the inadequate statement of reasons.
—