- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-191/08: Action brought on 22 May 2008 — JOOP! v OHIM
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0191
62008TN0191
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 183/27
(Case T-191/08)
(2008/C 183/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicants: JOOP! GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Schmidt-Hollburg, W. Möllering, A. Löhde, H. Leo, A. Witte, T. Frank, A. Theil, H.-P. Rühland, B. Willers and T. Rein)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 6 March 2008 in Case R 1822/2007-1;
—Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs including those incurred during the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark representing an exclamation mark, for goods in Classes 14, 18 and 25 (Application No 5 332 176).
Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the registration.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1), as the mark applied for has distinctive character and its availability does not have to be preserved.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11, 14.1.1994, p. 1).