- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-402/18: Action brought on 3 July 2018 — Aquino and Others v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0402
62018TN0402
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 364/14
(Case T-402/18)
(2018/C 364/14)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Roberto Aquino (Brussels, Belgium) and 30 other applicants (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well founded;
—consequently:
—annul the decision of 2 July 2018 requisitioning interpreters for 3 July 2018 as well as future decisions requisitioning interpreters for 4, 5, 10 and 11 July 2018;
—order the defendant to pay compensation for the non-material harm suffered, assessed on equitable principles at EUR 1 000 per applicant;
—order the defendant to pay all of the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-401/18, SFIE-PE v Parliament.