- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-246/25, Hańczynek: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 1 April 2025 – AS v BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0246
62025CN0246
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/3502
7.7.2025
(Case C-246/25,
Hańczynek)
(C/2025/3502)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: AS
Defendant: BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.
Questions referred
Must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (2) , as well as the principles of effectiveness and proportionality, be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation according to which, if it is found that an annex to a contract contains unfair terms resulting in the invalidity of that annex, the annex is deemed never to have been concluded, and the contract is deemed to have been in force from the beginning in its unaltered version?
—
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
(2)
OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3502/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—