Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

—

C/2025/2694

19.5.2025

(Case T-202/25)

(C/2025/2694)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: IP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

—declare the present appeal admissible and well founded;

—annul the applicant’s performance evaluation for 2023;

—annul the decision to reject the administrative review;

—order the EIB to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging breach of the reporting procedure. The applicant argues that, in rejecting the administrative review, the defendant relied on evidence that was not the subject of discussion between him and his reporting officer, in breach of the performance management guidelines for 2023 and his right to be heard.

2.Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors and infringement of the obligation to state reasons as well as infringement of the abovementioned guidelines. According to the applicant, the assessments made for each of the objectives and for one of the competencies established for 2023, as well as the overall assessments, are vitiated by manifest errors and by infringements of the obligation to state reasons. Furthermore, the applicant submits that certain assessments are extraneous to the objectives, in breach of the abovementioned guidelines.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2694/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—