- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-256/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024 – Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB), European Commission, Pilatus Holding ltd. (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0256
62022CA0256
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2275
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024 — Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB), European Commission, Pilatus Holding ltd.
(Case C-256/22 P) (*)
(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) - Withdrawal of authorisation - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Representation of a party - Authority to act granted to the lawyer - Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act)
(C/2024/2275)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pilatus Bank plc (represented by: O. Behrends, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: Pilatus Holding ltd., European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: M. Puidokas and E. Yoo, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: initially A. Nijenhuis, A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, and subsequently A. Steiblytė and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 2 February 2022, Pilatus Bank and Pilatus Holding v ECB (T-27/19, EU:T:2022:46);
2.Dismisses the action brought in Case T-27/19 as inadmissible;
3.Orders Pilatus Bank plc to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB) relating to the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings;
4.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs relating to the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings.
—
(*)
OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2275/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—