I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-510/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark representing a bounding feline - Earlier international figurative marks representing a bounding feline - Relative ground for refusal - No injury to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 263/23)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and S. Hanne, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gemma Group Srl (Cerasolo Ausa, Italy)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 April 2019 (Case R 2057/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Puma and Gemma Group.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Puma SE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140