- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-437/20: Action brought on 13 July 2020 — Ultrasun v EUIPO (ULTRASUN)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0437
62020TN0437
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.8.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 279/63
(Case T-437/20)
(2020/C 279/79)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Ultrasun AG (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark ULTRASUN — Application for registration No 17 898 794
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2020 in Case R 1453/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.