- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 12 September 2007.#Kalliopi Nikolaou v Commission of the European Communities.#Non-contractual liability - Inquiry of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) concerning a Member of the Court of Auditors - Divulging of information - Protection of personal information - Access to the inquiry file and to OLAF’s report - Sufficiently serious breach of the rules of law conferring rights on individuals - Causal link - Loss.#Case T-259/03.
ECLI:EU:T:2007:254
62003TJ0259
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-259/03)
Non-contractual liability – Inquiry of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) concerning a Member of the Court of Auditors – Divulging of information – Protection of personal information – Access to the inquiry file and to OLAF’s report – Sufficiently serious breach of the rules of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Loss
4. Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule conferring rights on individuals (Art. 288, second para., EC; European Parliament and Council Regulations No 1073/1999, Art. 8(3), and No 45/2001, Arts 2, 3, 4(1) and 5(a) and (e)) (see paras 200-216, 230-233)
6. Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Damage – Causal link (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 304, 320, 330, 333)
Re:
ACTION for damages, pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 288 EC, for the loss suffered by the applicant following publication of information concerning an inquiry carried out concerning her by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and OLAF’s refusal to grant her access to the inquiry file and to supply her with a copy of its final report.
Operative part
The Court:
1.Orders the Commission to pay the applicant compensation of EUR 3 000;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the action;
3.Orders the applicant to bear three quarters of her own costs and three quarters of the costs incurred by the Commission, which is to bear a quarter of its own costs and pay a quarter of the costs incurred by the applicant.