EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 January 1989. # Ursula Godfroy, née Wagner, v Court of Justice of the European Communities. # Admissibility. # Case 259/88.

ECLI:EU:C:1989:40

61988CO0259

January 26, 1989
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61988O0259

European Court reports 1989 Page 00123 Pub.RJ Page Pub somm

Parties

Keywords

Officials - Actions - Prior complaint through official channels - Implied decision of rejection not contested within the time-limits - Action barred ( Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91 )

In Case 259/88

Ursula Godfroy, née Wagner, an official of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, residing at 5 Hagsfelder Weg, 7513 Blankenloch, Federal Republic of Germany, represented by Edmond Lebrun, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Tony Biever, 83 boulevard Grande-Duchesse Charlotte,

applicant,

Court of Justice of the European Communities, represented by Francis Hubeau, Head of Division, acting as Agent, assisted by Denis Waelbroeck, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the former' s office in the Palais de la Cour de Justice ( No 1081 ), Kirchberg,

defendant,

APPLICATION for the reinstatement of the applicant after leave on personal grounds which ended on 15 September 1972,

THE COURT ( Fourth Chamber)

composed of : T . Koopmans, President of the Chamber, C . Kakouris and M . Díez de Velasco, Judges,

after hearing the views of the Advocate General,

hereby orders as follows :

( 1 ) The application is dismissed as inadmissible;

( 2 ) The parties shall bear their own costs .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia