EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 21 March 1997. # J. Antonissen v Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union. # Milk quotas - Action based on non-contractual liability of the Community - Interim relief - Payment of part of the compensation sought by way of advance - Conditions - Not fulfilled. # Case T-179/96 R.

ECLI:EU:T:1997:45

61996TO0179(01)

March 21, 1997
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61996B0179(01)

European Court reports 1997 Page II-00425

Summary

Applications for interim measures - Provisional measures - Grant of an advance payment of damages - Measure likely to prove irreversible - Conditions for granting (EC Treaty, Art. 186)

Where it is likely in practice to be irreversible in view of the applicant's financial situation and hence might have the effect of prejudging the decision of the Court of First Instance in the main proceedings, the grant of an advance payment of damages sought by way of interim relief may be envisaged only if, on the one hand, the pleas and arguments put forward by the applicant in support of his request appear prima facie particularly strong and well founded and, on the other hand, there is undeniable urgency.

Such likelihood of irreversibility exists specifically where, in order to prove the urgency of the application, the applicant describes the risk of bankruptcy to which he is exposed by his precarious financial situation, which in itself makes it scarcely possible in practice to make the advance subject to safeguards with a view to its repayment in the event that his claim in the main proceedings is rejected.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia