I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 472/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: M&T 1997, a.s. (Dobruška, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Dobřichovský, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VDS Czmyr Kowalik sp.k. (Świętochłowice, Poland)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: European Union design No 2 138 008-0031
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 August 2022 in Case R 29/2022-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—modify the contested decision so that the appeal brought by the applicant is upheld, the application for invalidity is dismissed and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the Invalidity Division;
—order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 25(1)b of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, read in conjunction with Article 6 thereof;
—Infringement of Article 64(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, read in conjunction with Article 65(1) thereof.