- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-832/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 July 2016 — Nutria v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Refusal to extend the deadline for the withdrawal of skimmed milk powder in the context of the programme for the distribution of food aid to the most deprived persons in the European Union for the year 2010 — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0832
62014TA0832
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.9.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 326/24
(Case T-832/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Non-contractual liability - Refusal to extend the deadline for the withdrawal of skimmed milk powder in the context of the programme for the distribution of food aid to the most deprived persons in the European Union for the year 2010 - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals))
(2016/C 326/43)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Nutria AE Typopoiisis & Emporias Agrotikon Proïonton (Agios Konstantinos, Greece) (represented by: initially M.-J. Jacquot and subsequently K. Makaronas, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Guillem Carrau, D. Triantafyllou, Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 268 TFEU, seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant allegedly sustained on account of the Commission’s refusal to extend the deadline for the withdrawal of skimmed milk powder set in Article 3(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1111/2009 of 19 November 2009 adopting the plan allocating to the Member States resources to be charged to the 2010 budget year for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community and derogating from certain provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 (OJ 2009 L 306, p. 5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Nutria AE Typopoiisis & Emporias Agrotikon Proïonton to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.
* * *
Language of the case: French