EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-385/08: Action brought on 15 September 2008 — Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein v OHIM (Representation of a dog)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0385

62008TN0385

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

6.12.2008

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/36

(Case T-385/08)

(2008/C 313/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research Development (Leopoldshöhe, Germany) (represented by C. Czychowski, A. Nordemann and A. Dustmann)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

annul Decision R 1734/2007-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 30 June 2008, together with the decision of the examiner of 25 September 2007 to the extent that protection was refused for the application for Community trade mark 4829321 for goods ‘leather goods included in Class 18; bags’ in Class 18 and ‘foodstuffs for animals and drinks for domestic animals’ in Class 31;

authorise the publication of the application for the registration of Community trade mark 4829321 in respect of those goods as well and

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Representation of a dog for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 31 — Application No 4 829 321

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the contested decision as regards ‘clothing, footwear and headgear; belts’ in Class 25

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 40/94, as the mark applied for is neither directly nor exclusively descriptive, and has a sufficiently distinctive character.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia