- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Luxembourg and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid implemented by Luxembourg in favour of ENGIE — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery — Tax rulings — State resources — Advantage — Combined effect of two tax measures — Participation exemption regime — Taxation of profit distributions — Abuse of law — Selectivity — Reference framework — Finding of a derogation — Comparability of situations — Parent-subsidiary arrangement — Group of companies — Recovery — Indirect harmonisation — Procedural rights — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0516
62018TA0516
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 263/16
(Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18) (*)
(State aid - Aid implemented by Luxembourg in favour of ENGIE - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery - Tax rulings - State resources - Advantage - Combined effect of two tax measures - Participation exemption regime - Taxation of profit distributions - Abuse of law - Selectivity - Reference framework - Finding of a derogation - Comparability of situations - Parent-subsidiary arrangement - Group of companies - Recovery - Indirect harmonisation - Procedural rights - Obligation to state reasons)
(2021/C 263/21)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant in Case T-516/18: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: T. Uri, acting as Agent, and D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)
Applicants in Case T-525/18: Engie Global LNG Holding Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Engie Invest International SA (Luxembourg), and Engie (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: B. Le Bret, M. Struys and C. Rydzynski, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and S. Noë, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant in Case T-516/18: Ireland (represented by: J. Quaney, M. Browne and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, assisted by P. Gallagher and S. Kingston, Senior Counsel, as well as B. Doherty, Barrister)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/421 of 20 June 2018 on State aid SA.44888 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Luxembourg in favour of ENGIE (OJ 2019 L 78, p. 1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Joins Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18 for the purposes of the judgment;
2.Dismisses the actions;
3.Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in Case T-516/18;
4.Orders Engie Global LNG Holding Sàrl, Engie Invest International SA and Engie to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in Case T-525/18;
5.Orders Ireland to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: French.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
15