- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-135/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2020 — Corporació Catalana de Mitjans Audiovisuals v EUIPO — Dalmat (LaTV3D) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark LaTV3D — Earlier national word mark TV3 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Distinctive character — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0135
62019TA0135
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.3.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 95/28
(Case T-135/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark LaTV3D - Earlier national word mark TV3 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the services - Similarity of the signs - Distinctive character - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 95/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Corporació Catalana de Mitjans Audiovisuals, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Erdozain López, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Stéphane Dalmat (Paris, France)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 December 2018 (Case R 874/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Corporació Catalana de Mitjans Audiovisuals and Mr Dalmat.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 December 2018 (Case R 874/2018-2) in so far as it ruled out the existence of a likelihood of confusion in relation to the services other than ‘translation and interpretation’ services in Class 41 of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.