EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-245/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Alberts v EUIPO – Techtex (Cardboard boxes [packaging]) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a cardboard box (packaging) – Earlier national word marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No similarity between the goods)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0245

62024TA0245

February 12, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1767

31.3.2025

(Case T-245/24)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a cardboard box (packaging) - Earlier national word marks - Ground for invalidity - Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - No similarity between the goods)

(C/2025/1767)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Adina Alberts (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: V. Roș and A. Livădariu, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: C. Bovar and E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Techtex SRL (Cicârlău, Romania) (represented by: B. Bularda, lawyer)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 March 2024 (Case R 1348/2023-3).

Operative part of the order

The Court:

Dismisses the action;

Orders Ms Adina Alberts to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by Techtex SRL;

Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C C/2024/3920, 1.7.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1767/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia