- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-258/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.° 1 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 11 June 2020 — HV v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0258
62020CN0258
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.9.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/7
(Case C-258/20)
(2020/C 320/09)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: HV
Defendant: Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)
Question referred
Is Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security (1) to be interpreted as precluding a national provision, like that at issue in the main proceedings (Article 60(4) TRLGSS), which provides that women who have had at least two biological or adopted children and are recipients of contributory retirement pensions are entitled to a pension supplement, whereas other women who are in identical circumstances and who, as a result of the fact that they are women, are faced with identical difficulties as regards remaining in the employment market, are not entitled to such a retirement pension supplement because they have taken voluntary early retirement which, by law, is subject to greater contribution conditions than an ordinary pension and identical or very similar age conditions?
(1) OJ 1979 L 6, p. 24.
* * *