- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-551/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 31 October 2016 — J. Klein Schiphorst v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0551
62016CN0551
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 30/20
(Case C-551/16)
(2017/C 030/24)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: J. Klein Schiphorst
Defendant: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen
Questions referred
1.May the power conferred by Article 64(1)(c) of Regulation No 883/2004, having regard to Article 63 and Article 7 of Regulation No 883/2004, the objective and scope of Regulation No 883/2004 and the free movement of persons and workers, be applied in such a way that a request for the extension of the export of an unemployment benefit can in principle be refused unless, in the view of the Uwv [Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen: Management Board of the Employee Insurance Agency], given the particular circumstances of the case, for example, where there is a concrete and demonstrable prospect of work, it would be unreasonable to refuse the extension of the export?
If not,
2.How should Member States apply the power conferred by Article 64(1)(c) of Regulation No 883/2004?
Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).
* * *