I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Case C-47/24,
Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 93/13/EEC - Consumer protection - Unfair terms in credit agreements denominated in a foreign currency concluded with consumers - Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/240)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: CN
Defendant: Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest High Court, Hungary), by decision of 10 January 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/240/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Hungarian.