EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-809/24, Trenitalia: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2024 – Trenitalia SpA v Regione Liguria

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0809

62024CN0809

November 26, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/536

3.2.2025

(Case C-809/24, Trenitalia)

(C/2025/536)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Trenitalia SpA

Respondent: Regione Liguria

Questions referred

1.Do Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 (1) – in particular, the second part of recital 27, Articles 1(2), 4(1) and 6(1), and paragraphs 2 and 6 of the annex to that regulation – and the principles and objectives of EU law laid down in the relevant provisions of the TFEU (Articles 14, 93 and 106 in particular) preclude – rendering the relevant provisions ineffective – a service contract, such as the one at issue in the present proceedings, that, in exchange for a total absence of risk on the part of the economic operator, entails a freely and knowingly accepted waiver of the right to a reasonable profit, where that waiver covers a limited period of time (three years), with a view to the direct award of a subsequent service contract for the maximum duration laid down in Article 5(6), read in conjunction with Article 4(4), of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007?

2.If the answer to that first question is in the affirmative, do Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – in particular, the first part of recital 27, recital 28, Articles 4(1) and 6(1), and paragraph 5 of the annex to that regulation – and the principles and objectives of EU law laid down in the relevant provisions of the TFEU (Articles 14, 93 and 106 in particular) preclude a service contract, such as the one at issue in the present proceedings, that does not provide for separate accounting of the costs and revenue of a service that is in part of a commercial nature, in so far as it is characterised by increased tariffs, in order to avoid the risk of overcompensation, rendering the contract ineffective and unenforceable in that respect?

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ 2007 L 315, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/536/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia