EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-748/15: Action brought on 21 December 2015 — Gauff v OHIM — H.P. Gauff Ingenieure (Gauff)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0748

62015TN0748

December 21, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.2.2016

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/26

(Case T-748/15)

(2016/C 078/36)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Molnar, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H.P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Gauff’ — Community trade mark No 6 192 521

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2015 in Case R 1350/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

in the alternative, refer the case back to OHIM for further examination of the disputed matters that were, in error, not examined;

order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Articles 53, 56, 57 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;

Infringement of Regulation No 2868/95;

Breach of the right to be heard;

Defective statement of reasons.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia