I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-748/15)
(2016/C 078/36)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Molnar, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H.P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Gauff’ — Community trade mark No 6 192 521
Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2015 in Case R 1350/2014-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—in the alternative, refer the case back to OHIM for further examination of the disputed matters that were, in error, not examined;
—order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.
—Infringement of Articles 53, 56, 57 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Regulation No 2868/95;
—Breach of the right to be heard;
—Defective statement of reasons.