EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-653/11: Action brought on 26 December 2011 — Jaber v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0653

62011TN0653

December 26, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/12

(Case T-653/11)

2012/C 58/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jaber (Lattakia, Syria) (represented by: M. Ponsard, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

admit this action applying an accelerated procedure;

annul, in so far as those acts concern the applicant;

Decision 2011/273/CFSP as amended and supplemented up to now, including all the decisions cited in Chapter 12 of the application;

Regulation No 442/2011 as amended and supplemented up to now, including all the regulations cited in Chapter 13 of the application;

Decision 2011/782/CFSP as amended and supplemented up to now;

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two plea(s) in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of fundamental rights and procedural guarantees, in particular the right to be heard, rights of defence, the obligation to state reasons and the principle of effective judicial protection, in so far as the applicant has not received formal notification of his inclusion on the list of persons sanctioned and in so far as the defendant has not responded to the applicant’s questions and has not explained on what grounds the applicant’s name was added to the lists at issue.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to property and the principle of economic freedom, as the contested measures adversely affect the applicant’s commercial activities.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia