I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Subsidies - Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 - Definitive countervailing duty - Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 - Price undercutting - Price pressure - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Causal link - Article 3(2) and Article 6(d) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Benefit - Article 3(1)(a)(i) and (2) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Direct transfer of funds - Article 7 of Regulation 2016/1037 - Calculation of the amount of the benefit - Article 8(1) and (8) of Regulation 2016/1037 - Threat of material injury - Rights of the defence)
(2023/C 63/39)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: PT Ciliandra Perkasa (West Jakarta, Indonesia) (represented by: F. Graafsma, J. Cornelis and E. Rogiest, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Kienapfel, G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Biodiesel Board (EBB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M.-S. Dibling and L. Amiel, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2092 of 28 November 2019 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia (OJ 2019 L 317, p. 42), in so far as that regulation concerns it.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders PT Ciliandra Perkasa to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.