- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-58/23, Abboudnam: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 6 February 2023 — Y.N. v Republika Slovenija
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0058
62023CN0058
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
JUDGMENT OF 6. 3. 2025 – CASE C-41/24 WALTHAM ABBEY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
(Case C-58/23, Abboudnam)
(2023/C 155/41)
Language of the case: Slovenian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Y.N.
Defendant: Republika Slovenija
Question referred
Must Article 46(4) of Directive 2013/32/EU, read in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter, be interpreted as precluding a national procedural rule, such as the second sentence of Article 70(1) of the ZMZ-1, which provides, for the lodging of an appeal against a decision by which the competent authority rejects an application as manifestly unfounded under an accelerated procedure, a time limit of three days from the notification of such a decision, including public holidays, which may expire at the end of the first working day thereafter?
* * *
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2012 C 326, p. 391).