- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1117/23: Action brought on 24 November 2023 — Usmanov v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1117
62023TN1117
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/768
22.1.2024
(Case T-1117/23)
(C/2024/768)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Alisher Usmanov (Tashkent, Uzbekistan) (represented by: D. Rovetta, M. Campa, M. Moretto, V. Villante and M. Pirovano, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
1)Annul
—Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1767 of 13 September 2023 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (1), and
—Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1765 of 13 September 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (2);
2)Order the Council to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging distortion of evidence and of the relevant facts and lack or reliability, specificity and probative value of the evidence relied upon by the Council.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment.
3.Third plea in law, alleging the breach of the right to effective judicial protection as well as of the duty to state reasons by the Council.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination.
5.Fifth plea in law, alleging violation of the principle of proportionality.
6.Sixth plea in law, alleging violation of fundamental rights to private life and property.
(1) OJ 2023, L 226, p. 104.
(2) OJ 2023, L 226, p. 3.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/768/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
END