I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of fatty acids originating in Indonesia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Article 9(1) of Regulation (UE) 2016/1036 - Continuation of the investigation after withdrawal of the complaint - Article 1(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Article 3(6) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Injury analysis - Article 21(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Union interest analysis - Manifest error of assessment - Error of law)
(C/2025/4444)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Arkema France (Colombes, France) (represented by: S. Dumon-Kappe, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Di Masi, G. Luengo and J. Zieliński, agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/111 of 18 January 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia (OJ 2023, L 18, p. 1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Arkema France to bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4444/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—