EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-420/09: Action brought on 19 October 2009 — BSA v OHIM — Loblaws (PRÉSIDENT)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0420

62009TN0420

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/37

(Case T-420/09)

(2009/C 312/61)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: BSA (Paris, France) (represented by: D. Masson, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Loblaws, Inc.

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of 17 August 2009 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM, (Case R 1744/2008-4),

Order OHIM to pay the entire costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: BSA

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘PRÉSIDENT’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 29, 30 and 42 — application for registration No 2 135 200

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Loblaws, Inc.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the French word mark ‘President’s Choice’ for goods in Classes 5, 30, 31 and 32 and the Community figurative mark ‘PRESIDENT’S CHOICE’ for goods in Classes 30, 31 and 32 (Community trade mark No 1 872 407)

Decision of the Opposition Division: partial upholding of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of appeal as inadmissible

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 [now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009] and of Article 71 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95, (1) and of the principle of the right to be heard in accordance with Article 6(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia