I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 371/42)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: M. Viefhues and T. Heitmann, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Verbis Alfa sp. z o.o. (Krakow, Poland), EasyPack sp. z o.o. (Krakow, Poland)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘InPost’ — Registration No 11 049 558
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 June 2015 in Case R 546/2014-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, insofar as it dismissed the applicant’s appeal in respect of identical services;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.