- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-108/15: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Bundesverband Glasindustrie and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources — Annulment of the act criticised by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TB0108
62015TB0108
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 295/31
(Case T-108/15) (*)
(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/39)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Bundesverband Glasindustrie (Düsseldorf, Germany) and the other 11 applicants whose names are annexed to the order (represented by: U. Soltész and C. von Köckritz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, and subsequently by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents, and by H. Wollmann, lawyer)
Re:
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH, successor in title to ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH, and of P-D Glasseiden GmbH Oschatz.
3.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Bundesverband Glasindustrie and those of the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex.
4.ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH, successor in title to ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH, and P-D Glasseiden GmbH Oschatz shall bear their own costs of the applications for leave to intervene.
(*) Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.