- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-366/14: Action brought on 28 May 2014 — August Storck v OHIM (2good)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0366
62014TN0366
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 253/48
(Case T-366/14)
2014/C 253/63
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: August Storck KG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: I. Rohr, A. Richter, P. Goldenbaum and T. Melchert, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 February 2014 in case R 996/2013-1;
—order the defendant to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: International registration designating the European Union of the word mark ‘2good’ for goods in Class 30 — International registration No 1 1 33 636
Decision of the Examiner: The application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was rejected
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.