EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-20/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — VI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Equal treatment — Stability in the composition of the selection board)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0020

62021TA0020

July 6, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.9.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/32

(Case T-20/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Equal treatment - Stability in the composition of the selection board)

(2022/C 340/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VI (represented by: D. Rovetta and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Lilamand, D. Milanowska and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of, first, the decision of the selection board for Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 not to include her on the competition reserve list, second, the decision of that selection board to refuse the applicant’s request for review of the initial decision, third, the Commission’s decision of 20 August 2019 rejecting her complaint, fourth, the notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 of 11 October 2018 organised for the purpose of drawing up two reserve lists from which the Commission would recruit administrators (AD 7) in the fields of customs and taxation and, fifth, the competition reserve list, as well as, moreover, seeking compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision, adopted after review, of the selection board for Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 of 27 February 2020 not to include VI’s name on the reserve list for that competition;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 128, 12.4.2021.

Language of the case: English

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia