- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-276/20: Action brought on 11 May 2020 — Crevier v EUIPO (Air deodorizing apparatus)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0276
62020TN0276
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 247/23
(Case T-276/20)
(2020/C 247/33)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Jeffrey Scott Crevier (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States) (represented by: M. Kime, Barrister)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Design: Application for registration No 5 652 872
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2020 in Case R 2396/2019-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the contested decision;
—set aside the decision of the Examiner appealed against in respect of rejection of the application for restitutio in integrum as a whole;
—grant of restitutio in integrum, alternatively, refer the matter back to EUIPO with appropriate directions to EUIPO;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of title VIII, ie Articles 62-78, of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of chapters VII–XIX, Articles 38-84 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002;
—Infringement of the EU Treaty;
—Infringement of a rule of law.