- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-173/16: Action brought on 18 April 2016 – Wöhlke v EUIPO – Danielle Roches (ALIQUA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0173
62016TN0173
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.6.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 232/22
—
(Case T-173/16)
(2016/C 232/30)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Christoph Wöhlke (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: V. Rust-Sorge, lawyer).
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Danielle Roches SARL (Paris, France)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ALIQUA’ – Application for registration No 12 079 381
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 January 2016 in Case R 905/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—revoke the contested decision.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 65(2) in connection with Art 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
—