I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 255/66)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Gamma-A SIA (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: M. Liguts, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Piejūra SIA (Nīcas novads, Latvia)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: European Union design No 2022 772-0001 (Packing for foodstuffs)
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2019 in Case R 2516/2017-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and declare the design valid;
—order EUIPO and the invalidity applicant to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.