I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-173/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Article 220(2) of the Customs Code - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Incorrect presentation of the facts - Import of raw cane sugar)
2013/C 108/20
Language of the case: Dutch
Appellant: Verenigde Douaneagenten BV (represented by: S. Moolenaar, advocaat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Burggraaf and L. Keppenne, Agents)
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2012 in Case T-32/11 <span class="italic">Verenigde Douaneagenten</span> v <span class="italic">Commission</span>, by which the General Court dismissed in part the application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1 October 2010 finding that there should be post clearance recovery of import duties and that remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (REC 02/09)
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Verenigde Douaneagenten BV are ordered to pay costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.