I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-716/19) (*)
(Dumping - Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine - Interim review - Calculation of the normal value - Selling, general and administrative costs - Sales between related companies - Ordinary course of trade - Single economic entity - Article 2(3), (4) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Export price - Adjustment - Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis - Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Manifest error of assessment - Methodology different from that used in a previous investigation - Article 11(9) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Legitimate expectations - Rights of the defence)
(2021/C 357/32)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Interpipe Niko Tube LLC (Nikopol, Ukraine), Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant OJSC (Dnipro, Ukraine) (represented by: B. Servais, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1295 of 1 August 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1469 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel, originating in Russia and Ukraine, following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (OJ 2019 L 204, p. 22).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Interpipe Niko Tube LLC and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant OJSC to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140